talking about leadership?

what type of leaders are you talking about?

where are the leaders leading the followers to?

why do people need leaders now anyway - ?

There is a peeve mentioned above - but is it really clear that that that peeve is an objection to the removal of the original statement which occurs after substantive posts have been removed afterwords - (this is in reference to a network where there is supposed thinking going on and yet posts are routinely removed from the threads because they don't seem to follow anyone else's line of thinking or understanding for that matter)

if - and this is a supposition - people are really and honestly interested in thought and the process by which it takes its course - then the removal of anything from any part of the chain of development (no matter what was said or why it was removed) automatically obliterates the chain of development and leaving any or all of what is there once some part of the chain is removed is a false representation of the development -

for example -

Thomas Edison went and invented a light bulb -

great -


he did 10,000 failed experiments towards making that light bulb - before he hit upon a successful try that got him his invention - the light bulb -

Edison's approach was that he did not have 10,000 failures but found 10,000 ways with which not to take the approach in his next attempts -

this shows a process of thinking which is very different then simply going on to another experiment but a methodical approach - which for his type of creation or experiments towards inventions were important or at least worked for him -

All humans do not work or think or follow the same methods when aiming for whatever goals that they are developing or working through -

just as all businesses are not begun or conceived of or serve people the same way and all marketing strategies are not made from the same mold and all radical variations from the norm do not work for all types of other businesses - so

What is a leader of a network is not the same as a leader of a business is not the same as the leader of an entire industry is not the same as a leader of a nation or is not the leader of a society -

which leaders are we referring to and why is the leader of a network not allowed to be challenged - is this a dictatorship?

are the few people who agree with the leader able to help that leader enforce the dictatorial stance and go on to calling this a think environment -

is the leader above challenge?

are we in a brain wash environment -

on the Internet - when so many people are fed the same formula for doing one thing or the other - does anyone ever think that the repetition of this same formula over and over and over again is hardly doing anything but creating temporary bursts of energy in one direction or the other but nothing sustainable since there is the need which was there in the first place and is still there that remains unfulfilled?


and if this particular post is removed - what is the righteousness in that - on whose terms and by whose definition?